4.3 Article

Plasma neurofilament light chain in children with relapsing MS receiving teriflunomide or placebo: A post hoc analysis of the randomized TERIKIDS trial

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 385-394

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/13524585221144742

关键词

Neurofilament light chain; pediatric MS; teriflunomide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The TERIKIDS study demonstrated that teriflunomide is effective and safe in children with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Teriflunomide treatment is associated with significantly reduced pNfL levels in children with RMS.
Background: The phase 3 TERIKIDS study demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety for teriflunomide versus placebo in children with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Objective: Evaluate plasma neurofilament light chain (pNfL) concentrations in TERIKIDS. Methods: Patients received placebo or teriflunomide (14 mg adult equivalent) for up to 96 weeks in the double-blind (DB) period. In the open-label extension (OLE), all patients received teriflunomide until up to 192 weeks after randomization. pNfL was measured using single-molecule array assay (Simoa((R)) NF-light((TM))). Results: Baseline mean age was 14.5 years; 69.4% were female. Baseline geometric least square mean pNfL levels were similar for teriflunomide (n = 78) and placebo (n = 33) patients (19.83 vs 18.30 pg/mL). Over the combined DB and OLE periods, pNfL values were lower for teriflunomide versus placebo (analysis of variance p < 0.01; Week 192: 10.61 vs 17.32 pg/mL). Observed between-group pNfL differences were attenuated upon adjustment for gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing or new/enlarged T2 lesion counts at DB Week 24. Higher baseline pNfL levels were associated with shorter time since first MS symptom onset, higher baseline Gd-enhancing lesion counts and T2 lesion volume, and increased hazard of high magnetic resonance imaging activity or clinical relapse during the DB period. Conclusion: Teriflunomide treatment was associated with significantly reduced pNfL levels in children with RMS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据