4.3 Article

Relationship between paramagnetic rim lesions and slowly expanding lesions in multiple sclerosis

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 352-362

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/13524585221141964

关键词

Chronic active lesions; paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs); slowly expanding lesions (SELs); volumetric MRI; susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI); multiple sclerosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that chronic active lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), known as slowly expanding lesions (SELs) and paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs), are associated with greater clinical progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. SELs are more numerous than PRLs in MS patients.
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers for chronic active lesions in MS include slowly expanding lesions (SELs) and paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs). Objectives: To identify the relationship between SELs and PRLs in MS, and their association with disability. Methods: 61 people with MS (pwMS) followed retrospectively with MRI including baseline susceptibility-weighted imaging, and longitudinal T1 and T2-weighted scans. SELs were computed using deformation field maps; PRLs were visually identified. Mixed-effects models assessed differences in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score changes between the group defined by the presence of SELs and or PRLs. Results: The median follow-up time was 3.2 years. At baseline, out of 1492 lesions, 616 were classified as SELs, and 80 as PRLs. 92% of patients had > 1 SEL, 56% had > 1 PRL, while both were found in 51%. SELs compared to non-SELs were more likely to also be PRLs (7% vs. 4%, p = 0.027). PRL counts positively correlated with SEL counts (rho= 0.28, p = 0.03). SEL + PRL + patients had greater increases in EDSS over time (beta = 0.15/year, 95% confidence interval (0.04, 0.27), p = 0.009) than SEL+PRL-patients. Conclusion: SELs are more numerous than PRLs in pwMS. Compared with either SELs or PRLs found in isolation, their joint occurrence was associated with greater clinical progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据