4.7 Article

Tracking the origin of black holes with the stochastic gravitational wave background popcorn signal

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad082

关键词

black hole physics; gravitational waves

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unresolved sources of gravitational waves (GWs) from the merger of binary black holes at cosmological distances combine into a stochastic background, which can be categorized into the continuous or popcorn regime depending on the number of overlapping events in the same frequency band. We compare the detection regime of the background in models of primordial black holes (PBHs) and those of black holes of stellar origin, and find that ground-based detectors show a higher duty cycle for the PBH-origin background due to differences in their mass function and merger rate. Our study offers the possibility of determining the primordial or astrophysical nature of black hole populations by examining the statistical properties of the stochastic background.
Unresolved sources of gravitational waves (GWs) produced by the merger of a binary of black holes at cosmological distances combine into a stochastic background. Such a background is in the continuous or popcorn regime, depending on whether the GW rate is high enough so that two or more events overlap in the same frequency band. These two regimes respectively correspond to large and small values of the so-called duty cycle. We study the detection regime of the background in models of primordial black holes (PBHs) and compare it to the one produced by black holes of stellar origin. Focusing on ground-based detectors, we show that the duty cycle of the PBH-origin background is larger than that of astrophysical black holes because of differences in their mass function and the merger rate. Our study opens up the possibility to learn about the primordial or astrophysical nature of black hole populations by examining the statistical properties of the stochastic background.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据