4.6 Article

The Relativistic Effects on the Carbon-Carbon Coupling Constants Mediated by a Heavy Atom

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 120, 期 28, 页码 5624-5634

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b10258

关键词

-

资金

  1. Polish National Science Centre from Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing [2014/15/B/ST4/05039]
  2. European Union, Regional Development Fund
  3. Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic
  4. Slovak Academy of Sciences VEGA [2/0148/13]
  5. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-0510-12]
  6. Ministry of Science and High Education of Poland [2014/1S/B/ST4/05039]
  7. [MPD/2010/4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The (2)J(CC), (3)J(CC), and (4)J(CC) spin-spin coupling constants in the systems with a heavy atom (Cd, In, Sn, Sb, Te, Hg, Tl, Pb, Bi, and Po) in the coupling path have been calculated by means of density functional theory. The main goal was to estimate the relativistic effects on spin-spin coupling constants and to explore the factors which may influence them, including the nature of the heavy atom and carbon hybridization. The methods applied range, in order of reduced complexity, from the Dirac-Kohn-Sham (DKS) method (density functional theory with four-component Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian), through DFT with two- and one-component zeroth-order regular approximation (ZORA) Hamiltonians, to scalar effective core potentials (ECPs) with the nonrelativistic Hamiltonian. The use of DKS and ZORA methods leads to very similar results, and small-core ECPs of the MDF and MWB variety reproduce correctly the scalar relativistic effects. Scalar relativistic effects usually are larger than the spin-orbit coupling effects. The latter tend to influence the most the coupling constants of the sp(3)-hybridized carbon atoms and in compounds of the p-block heavy atoms. Large spin-orbit coupling contributions for the Po compounds are probably connected with the inverse of the lowest triplet excitation energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据