4.6 Review

PROTACs in Epigenetic Cancer Therapy: Current Status and Future Opportunities

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28031217

关键词

epigenetics; cancer therapy; PROTACs; protein degradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The epigenetic regulation of gene functions is closely associated with cancer development and progression. Reprogramming the cancer epigenome landscape is a promising target therapy for treating cancer and reversing drug resistance. Proteolytic targeted chimeras (PROTACs) are emerging therapeutic modality that selectively degrade proteins via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Many PROTAC degraders have been designed in the field of epigenetic cancer therapy, and targeting epigenetic proteins with PROTACs can enhance target druggability and improve mechanistic understanding of cancer epigenetic regulation. This review focuses on the progress in developing PROTAC degraders and PROTAC drugs targeting epigenetics in cancer, and discusses challenges and future opportunities for this field.
The epigenetic regulation of gene functions has been proven to be strongly associated with the development and progression of cancer. Reprogramming the cancer epigenome landscape is one of the most promising target therapies in both treatments and in reversing drug resistance. Proteolytic targeted chimeras (PROTACs) are an emerging therapeutic modality for selective degradation via the native ubiquitin-proteasome system. Rapid advances in PROTACs have facilitated the exploration of targeting epigenetic proteins, a lot of PROTAC degraders have already been designed in the field of epigenetic cancer therapy, and PROTACs targeting epigenetic proteins can better exploit target druggability and improve the mechanistic understanding of the epigenetic regulation of cancer. Thus, this review focuses on the progress made in the development of PROTAC degraders and PROTAC drugs targeting epigenetics in cancer and discusses challenges and future opportunities for the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据