4.6 Article

Biological Activity of Amidino-Substituted Imidazo [4,5-b]pyridines

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28010034

关键词

amidines; antibacterial activity; antiproliferative activity; antiviral activity; imidazo[4; 5-b]pyridines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of cyano- and amidino-substituted imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines were synthesized and evaluated for their biological activity. The compounds showed strong antiproliferative activity against colon carcinoma, with compound 10 and 14 displaying the most pronounced activity. Compound 14 also exhibited moderate antibacterial activity against E. coli, while other compounds lacked antibacterial activity. Derivatives 7 and 17 showed selective but moderate antiviral activity against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).
A series of cyano- and amidino-substituted imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines were synthesized using standard methods of organic synthesis, and their biological activity was evaluated. Biological evaluation included in vitro assessment of antiproliferative effects on a diverse selection of human cancer cell lines, antibacterial activity against chosen Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains, and antiviral activity on a broad panel of DNA and RNA viruses. The most pronounced antiproliferative activity was observed for compound 10, which contained an unsubstituted amidino group, and compound 14, which contained a 2-imidazolinyl amidino group; both displayed selective and strong activity in sub-micromolar inhibitory concentration range against colon carcinoma (IC50 0.4 and 0.7 mu M, respectively). All tested compounds lacked antibacterial activity, with the exception of compound 14, which showed moderate activity against E. coli (MIC 32 mu M). Bromo-substituted derivative 7, which contained an unsubstituted phenyl ring (EC50 21 mu M), and para-cyano-substituted derivative 17 (EC50 58 mu M) showed selective but moderate activity against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据