4.6 Article

In Silico Identification of 1-DTP Inhibitors of Corynebacterium diphtheriae Using Phytochemicals from Andrographis paniculata

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28020909

关键词

Andrographis paniculata (Burm; f; ) Wall; ex Nees; diphtheria toxin; autodock; bisandrographolide; andrographiside and phytochemicals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using in silico approach, several phytochemicals from Andrographis paniculata were identified as potential drug molecules against diphtheria. Docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies narrowed down the search to bisandrographolide and andrographiside as hit compounds. Further modification and in vitro/in vivo studies can be conducted to evaluate their effectiveness.
A number of phytochemicals have been identified as promising drug molecules against a variety of diseases using an in-silico approach. The current research uses this approach to identify the phyto-derived drugs from Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Wall. ex Nees (AP) for the treatment of diphtheria. In the present study, 18 bioactive molecules from Andrographis paniculata (obtained from the PubChem database) were docked against the diphtheria toxin using the AutoDock vina tool. Visualization of the top four molecules with the best dockscore, namely bisandrographolide (-10.4), andrographiside (-9.5), isoandrographolide (-9.4), and neoandrographolide (-9.1), helps gain a better understanding of the molecular interactions. Further screening using molecular dynamics simulation studies led to the identification of bisandrographolide and andrographiside as hit compounds. Investigation of pharmacokinetic properties, mainly ADMET, along with Lipinski's rule and binding affinity considerations, narrowed down the search for a potent drug to bisandrographolide, which was the only molecule to be negative for AMES toxicity. Thus, further modification of this compound followed by in vitro and in vivo studies can be used to examine itseffectiveness against diphtheria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据