4.6 Article

In Situ-Generated, Dispersed Cu Catalysts for the Catalytic Hydrogenolysis of Glycerol

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27248778

关键词

dispersed copper particles; glycerol; propylene glycol; hydrogenolysis; heterogeneous catalysis

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation (RSF)
  2. [22-13-00252]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study experimentally verifies a concept for the hydrogenolysis of glycerol using in situ-generated copper dispersed particles (Cu-DP). It shows that the selectivity between 1,2-propylene glycol and lactic acid can be tuned by adjusting hydrogen pressure or alkalinity. The activity of the in situ-generated Cu-DP catalyst is comparable to that of an industrial Cu-Cr2O3 catalyst.
The present study is dedicated to the experimental verification of a concept for the hydrogenolysis of glycerol over in situ-generated Cu dispersed particles (Cu-DP). The Cu-DP were generated by in situ reduction of a precursor salt (Cu(OAc)(2), CuSO4, CuCl2) in the presence of KOH and were active in glycerol conversion under hydrogen (T = 200-220 degrees C, p(H-2) = 1-4 MPa), where 1,2-propylene glycol (PG) and lactic acid (LA) were detected to be the main products. The influence of the reaction conditions (temperature, hydrogen pressure, reaction time, catalyst-to-feed ratio and the KOH/Cu ratio) on the yields of the products is described. It was shown that the selectivity between the PG and LA could be tuned by changing p(H-2) or by the KOH amount, i.e., higher yields of LA corresponded to lower p(H-2) and higher alkalinity of the reaction media. The activity of the in situ-generated Cu-DP was found to be comparable to that of an industrial Cu-Cr2O3 catalyst. The Cu-DP catalysts were characterized by XRD, XPS, HRTEM and SEM. During the reaction, the catalyst evolved by the sintering and recrystallization of the separate Cu-DP; the crystallite sizes after 1 and 15 h reaction times amounted to 35 and 49 nm, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据