4.7 Article

Expression pattern of secretory-cell-related transcriptional signatures in colon adenocarcinomas defines tumor microenvironment characteristics and correlates with clinical outcomes

期刊

MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 499-517

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13338

关键词

chemotherapy; colon cancer; immunotherapy; molecular subtype; prognosis; secretory cells

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified the tumor heterogeneity related to secretory cell signature expression patterns in colon cancer. A scoring model, SCS score, was developed to guide personalized therapeutic strategies for colon cancer patients.
Despite the connection of secretory cells to distinct mucus-containing colon cancer histological subtypes and the interaction of secretory cells with immune cells in the pathogenesis of intestinal inflammatory diseases, whether the secretory cell signatures are associated with tumor microenvironment (TME) heterogeneity and can aid in colon cancer patient classification have not been investigated. Here, by performing the principal component analysis and consensus clustering analysis, we identified four distinct expression patterns based on secretory cell signatures which were significantly associated with different clinical behaviors, TME landscape, pathway activation, genomic mutations, and DNA methylation characteristics. Subsequently, a 'SCS score' model was constructed. The high SCS score indicated a pattern of 'secretory cell subtype 2', which was characterized by stromal infiltration and activation, and predicted poor prognosis and low sensitivity to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy, but high sensitivity to PI3K catalytic subunit inhibitors. In conclusion, our study comprehensively uncovered the tumor heterogeneity related to secretory cell signature expression patterns. Moreover, the SCS score can supplement routine histopathological assessments to guide personalized therapeutic strategies in colon cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据