4.6 Article

Itraconazole Confers Cytoprotection Against Neurodegenerative Disease-Associated Abnormal Protein Aggregation

期刊

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 60, 期 5, 页码 2397-2412

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-023-03230-0

关键词

Itraconazole; Proteasome; Misfolded proteins; Neurodegeneration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cells perform regular maintenance to avoid protein misfolding accumulation, which can lead to ageing-related diseases. Itraconazole treatment induces proteasome activities to degrade misfolded proteins, including those associated with neurodegenerative diseases. These findings suggest that Itraconazole has a potential therapeutic role in preventing protein misfolding neurodegenerative diseases.
Cells perform regular maintenance to avoid the accumulation of misfolded proteins. Prolonged accumulation of these proteotoxic inclusions generates potential risk of ageing-related diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, removal of such abnormal aggregates can ensure the re-establishment of proteostasis. Ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) actively participates in the selective removal of aberrantly folded clients with the help of complex proteasome machinery. However, specific induction of proteasome functions to remove abnormal proteins remains an open challenge. Here, we show that Itraconazole treatment induces proteasome activities and degrades the accumulation of bonafide-misfolded proteins, including heat-denatured luciferase. Exposure of Itraconazole elevates the degradation of neurodegenerative disease-associated proteins, e.g. expanded polyglutamine, mutant SOD1, and mutant alpha-synuclein. Our results suggest that Itraconazole treatment prevents the accumulation of neurodegenerative disease-linked misfolded proteins and generates cytoprotection. These findings reveal that Itraconazole removes abnormal proteins through sequential proteasomal activation and represents a potential protective therapeutic role against protein-misfolding neurodegenerative diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据