4.5 Article

The accessory protein TagV is required for full Type VI secretion system activity in Serratia marcescens

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.15027

关键词

bacterial protein secretion; Serratia marcescens; Type VI accessory genes; Type VI secretion system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel accessory component required for optimal T6SS activity in Serratia marcescens, called TagV, was identified. TagV promotes T6SS firing by binding to peptidoglycan, in contrast to TssJ. Homologues of tagV were found in other bacterial genera, suggesting that the accessory function of TagV is not specific to S. marcescens.
The bacterial Type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a dynamic macromolecular structure that promotes inter- and intra-species competition through the delivery of toxic effector proteins into neighbouring cells. The T6SS contains 14 well-characterised core proteins necessary for effector delivery (TssA-M, PAAR). In this study, we have identified a novel accessory component required for optimal T6SS activity in the opportunistic pathogen Serratia marcescens, which we name TagV. Deletion of tagV, which encodes an outer membrane lipoprotein, caused a reduction in the T6SS-dependent antibacterial activity of S. marcescens Db10. Mutants of S. marcescens lacking the core component TssJ, a distinct outer membrane lipoprotein previously considered essential for T6SS firing, retained a modest T6SS activity that could be abolished through deletion of tagV. TagV did not interact with the T6SS membrane complex proteins TssL or TssM, but is proposed to bind to peptidoglycan, indicating that the mechanism by which TagV promotes T6SS firing differs from that of TssJ. Homologues of tagV were identified in several other bacterial genera, suggesting that the accessory function of TagV is not restricted to S. marcescens. Together, our findings support the existence of a second, TssJ-independent mechanism for T6SS firing that is dependent upon the activity of TagV proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据