4.4 Article

Measurement of Protein Synthesis Rate in Rat by [11C]Leucine PET Imaging: Application to the TgF344-AD Model of Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 596-605

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-022-01796-0

关键词

Alzheimer's Disease; TgF344-AD Rats; Amino Acid PET; Protein Synthesis rate; [C-11]Leucine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study implemented a method using [C-11]leucine PET to measure cerebral protein synthesis rate (PSR) in rats and found that it is sensitive enough to measure PSR alterations in Alzheimer's disease. The study also discovered that the genotype has a significant effect on PSR in the globus pallidus.
Long-term memory requires stable protein synthesis and is altered in Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study aimed to implement a method to measure the cerebral protein synthesis rate (PSR) with [C-11]leucine PET in vivo in rats and evaluate potential PSR alterations longitudinally (6, 12 and 18 months old) in the TgF344-AD rat model of AD. Wistar, wild-type (WT) and TgF344-AD rats (TG) were scanned for 60 min with [C-11]leucine. Arterial blood activity was monitored online and with discrete whole blood and plasma samples by gamma-counting in Wistar rats, WT (n = 4) and TG (n = 5). Unlabelled amino acids were measured in plasma. The sensitivity of [C-11]leucine PET to measure alterations in PSR was assessed in Wistar rats by injection of PSR inhibitor anisomycin before PET acquisition. Anisomycin administration significantly reduced the net uptake rate constant (K-cplx) of [C-11]leucine and PSR, proving the suitability of the method. For the longitudinal study, averaged population-based input functions were used to calculate PSR. We found a significant genotype effect on PSR (decrease in TG vs WT) only in the globus pallidus. This study suggests that [C-11]leucine PET is sensitive enough to measure brain PSR in rat but that cross-sectional design with individual input function should be preferred.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据