4.5 Article

Novel 1,2,4-triazoles derived from Ibuprofen: synthesis and in vitro evaluation of their mPGES-1 inhibitory and antiproliferative activity

期刊

MOLECULAR DIVERSITY
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 2185-2215

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11030-022-10551-0

关键词

1,2,4-Triazole; Atropisomer; Diastereotope; X-ray diffraction; Cancer; Angiogenesis; mPGES-1; Cytotoxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, novel triazole-bearing ketone and oxime derivatives were synthesized from Ibuprofen, and their cytotoxic activities against cancer cells were evaluated. Some compounds showed anti-inflammatory and angiogenesis inhibitory activities without toxicity, suggesting their potential as promising agents in anti-inflammatory and cancer treatments.
Some novel triazole-bearing ketone and oxime derivatives were synthesized from Ibuprofen. In vitro cytotoxic activities of all synthesized molecules against five cancer lines (human breast cancer MCF-7, human lung cancer A549, human prostate cancer PC-3, human cervix cancer HeLa, and human chronic myelogenous leukemia K562 cell lines) were evaluated by MTT assay. In addition, mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (NIH/3T3) were also evaluated to determine the selectivity. Compounds 18, 36, and 45 were found to be the most cytotoxic, and their IC50 values were in the range of 17.46-68.76 mu M, against the tested cancer cells. According to the results, compounds 7 and 13 demonstrated good anti-inflammatory activity against the microsomal enzyme prostaglandin E2 synthase-1 (mPGES-1) enzyme at IC50 values of 13.6 and 4.95 mu M. The low cytotoxicity and non-mutagenity of these compounds were found interesting. Also, these compounds significantly prevented tube formation in angiogenesis studies. In conclusion, the anti-inflammatory and angiogenesis inhibitory activities of these compounds without toxicity suggested that they may be promising agents in anti-inflammatory treatment and they may be supportive agents for the cancer treatment. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据