4.6 Article

Blue light does not impair wound healing in vitro

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.04.007

关键词

Blue light; Fibroblasts; Phototherapy; Scratch; Wound healing

资金

  1. College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Irradiation with red or near infrared light promotes tissue repair, while treatment with blue light is known to be antimicrobial. Consequently, it is thought that infected wounds could benefit more from combined blue and red/infrared light therapy; but there is a concern that blue light may slow healing. We investigated the effect of blue 470 nm light on wound healing, in terms of wound closure, total protein and collagen synthesis, growth factor and cytokines expression, in an in vitro scratch wound model. Human dermal fibroblasts were cultured for 48 h until confluent. Then a linear scratch wound was created and irradiated with 3, 5, 10 or 55 J/cm(2). Control plates were not irradiated. Following 24 h of incubation, cells were fixed and stained for migration and fluorescence analyses and the supernatant collected for quantification of total protein, hydroxyproline, bFGF, IL-6 and IL-10. The results showed that wound closure was similar for groups treated with 3, 5 and 10 J/cm(2), with a slight improvement with the 5 J/cm(2) dose, and slower closure with 55 J/cm(2) p < 0.001). Total protein concentration increased after irradiation with 3, 5 and 10 J/cm(2), reaching statistical significance at 5 J/cm(2) compared to control (p < 0.0001). However, hydroxyproline levels did not differ between groups. Similarly, bFGF and IL-10 concentrations did not differ between groups, but IL-6 concentration decreased progressively as fluence increased (p < 0.0001). Fluorescence analysis showed viable cells regardless of irradiation fluence. We conclude that irradiation with blue light at low fluence does not impair in vitro wound healing. The significant decrease in IL-6 suggests that 470 nm light is anti-inflammatory. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据