4.5 Article

The Effect of Ultrasound Treatment on Oil Agglomeration of Barite

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08827508.2022.2155957

关键词

Ultrasound; oil agglomeration; barite; contact angle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of ultrasonic treatment on oil agglomeration of barite ore. The use of ultrasound improved the agglomeration efficiency of barite during oil agglomeration and reduced the consumption of oleate and kerosene. However, using ultrasound only during the agglomeration stage had a negative effect on agglomeration recovery.
In this study, the effect of ultrasonic treatment on oil agglomeration of barite ore was investigated. The ultrasound process not only improved the agglomeration efficiency of barite when applied as a pretreatment in the process of oil agglomeration of barite, but also reduced the consumption of oleate and kerosene. On the other hand, the use of only the ultrasonic process, in other words, its use at the agglomeration stage, negatively affected the agglomeration recovery. The power of ultrasound and the time of treatment were also important parameters affecting the agglomeration process of barite, and more successful agglomeration was achieved with short-term ultrasound pretreatment at a low power value (60 W, 120 sec). In addition, depending on the oleate concentration, the ultrasound process further increased the zeta potential of the barite, and this increase showed that the oleate adsorption on the barite surface increased. Moreover, higher contact angle values were obtained with ultrasound than the experiments without ultrasound at the same conditions. However, increasing the power of ultrasound and the time of treatment not only reduced the agglomeration efficiency, but also reduced the contact angle values of the barite. As a result, while the agglomeration recovery was 88.63% without ultrasound, it increased to 99.45% with ultrasonic pretreatment at the same conditions of 40 L/ton kerosene and 2 kg/ton oleate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据