期刊
MILBANK QUARTERLY
卷 101, 期 1, 页码 11-25出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12597
关键词
Medicare; alternative payment models; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation; payment reform; fee-for-service; health care finance
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) aims to develop evidence-based alternative payment models (APM) to enhance healthcare quality and decrease costs, but its achievement in these goals has been inconsistent. In October 2021, CMMI released its Innovation Strategy Refresh to address challenges in payment models and propose new strategies. However, there are still unresolved issues, including engaging physicians and patients in APMs, minimizing conflicting incentives, reducing selection bias, and transitioning from fee-for-service framework. This article offers guidance and solutions to improve CMMI's vision and tackle these challenges.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) seeks to develop evidence-based alternative payment models (APM) to improve health care quality and reduce costs, but its performance in achieving these goals has been mixed. In October 2021, CMMI released its Innovation Strategy Refresh to highlight challenges faced by payment models and suggest new strategic approaches for the upcoming decade. While a welcome recast of organizational goals, the Refresh leaves space for how CMMI will address persistent issues. These include how CMMI can best engage physicians and patients in APMs, minimize conflicting incentives among APMs, reduce selection bias in model participation, and, ultimately, transition away from the fee-for-service framework that underlies much of Medicare reimbursement. This article provides guidance to CMMI's vision by examining challenges within CMMI's strategy for model building and offering solutions to mitigate these issues. These strategies include engaging beneficiaries in APM incentives, expanding operational flexibility to improve clinical behaviors (e.g., waivers), rectifying issues with conflicting model incentives, building voluntary short-term and mandatory long-term incentives to mitigate selection bias, and transitioning to an overriding population-based model to constrain net costs. Policy PointsThe Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) seeks to develop evidence-based alternative payment models (APM) to improve care quality and reduce health care cost, but its performance in achieving these goals has been mixed.In October 2021, CMMI released a strategic refresh of its goals but left space for how persistent issues to model development would be addressed.We propose strategies to engage physicians and patients in APMs, minimize conflicting incentives among APMs, reduce selection bias in model participation, and, ultimately, transition away from the fee-for-service framework that underlies much of Medicare reimbursement.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据