4.5 Article

The role of serum circulating microbial toxins in severity and cytokine storm of COVID positive patients

期刊

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105888

关键词

Covid-19; Endotoxemia; Lipopolysaccharide; Cytokine storm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of Covid-19 is a global problem causing increasing mortality rates and lacking verified treatment. The abnormal unrestricted response called cytokine storm, which is triggered by increased amounts of cytokine production, contributes to the severity of Covid-19 and the development of respiratory failure and pneumonia. The interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and endotoxins plays a role in the excessively elevated release of cytokines and the worsening of Covid-19.
The emergence of Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is a global problem nowadays, causing health difficulty with increasing mortality rates, which doesn't have a verified treatment. SARS-CoV-2 infection has various pathological and epidemiological characteristics, one of them is increased amounts of cytokine production, which in order activate an abnormal unrestricted response called cytokine storm. This event contributes to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which results in respiratory failure and pneumonia and is the great cause of death associated with Covid-19. Endotoxemia and the release of bacterial lipopolysaccharides (endotoxins) from the lumen into the bloodstream enhance proinflammatory cytokines. SARS-CoV-2 can straightly interplay with endotoxins via its S protein, leading to the extremely elevating release of cytokines and consequently increase the harshness of Covid-19. In this review, we will discuss the possible role of viralbacterial interaction that occurs through the transfer of bacterial products such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from the intestine into the bloodstream, exacerbating the severity of Covid-19 and cytokine storms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据