4.6 Article

Phase Stability and Deformation Modes in Functionally Graded Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steel; A Novel Approach to Evaluate the Role of Nitrogen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AISI 304 stainless steel plate was functionally graded with symmetrical nitrogen concentration profile by high-temperature solution nitriding. The responses to plastic deformation and austenite stability were investigated by cold rolling. The evolutions of nitrogen concentration profile, phase distribution, deformation microstructure, and hardness were characterized. The results demonstrate the influence of nitrogen content on deformation modes and stacking fault energy in Fe-Cr-Ni alloys.
An austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 plate was functionally graded by interstitial alloying with nitrogen by high-temperature solution nitriding, resulting in a symmetrical nitrogen concentration profile over the plate thickness. The responses to plastic deformation and austenite stability were investigated by applying cold rolling up to 70 pct overall thickness reduction of the plate. Electron probe microanalysis, X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy, and hardness indentation were applied for characterization of the evolutions of nitrogen concentration profile, phase distribution, deformation microstructure, and hardness developing upon plastic deformation. The results demonstrate that the critical nitrogen content necessary to prevent deformation-induced martensite formation increases in the low-to-medium strain range, while it dramatically increases at high strain levels. With increasing nitrogen content, the dominant deformation mode evolves from deformation-induced martensite formation to a mixture of martensite and twin formation, and, eventually twinning and dislocation glide. The plastic strain regimes for the various deformation modes depend strongly on the nitrogen content. The results are discussed in relation to the effect of nitrogen content on the stacking fault energy of austenite in Fe-Cr-Ni alloys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据