4.5 Article

Impact of a professional development session based on learner evaluations within a preceptor community of practice

期刊

MEDICAL TEACHER
卷 45, 期 7, 页码 732-739

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2155121

关键词

Community of practice; professional development; medical education; medical teaching; learner evaluations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the impact of using learner feedback to create a professional development session for physician preceptors. The feedback helped identify areas for improvement and strategies to address these challenges.
BackgroundPhysician preceptors play key roles in teaching medical professional trainees but receive little formal teacher training. One proposed way to improve teaching is by providing preceptors with learner feedback. The feedback from learner evaluations often has a limited impact with changes to teaching practice difficult to implement. This study explores the effect of using learner feedback to create a professional development session on teaching within a preceptor community of practice.MethodsIn this case study, 15 preceptors agreed to release their learner evaluations, and ten participated in the professional development session. Immediately and 2-3 months after the session, participants completed surveys on their intention to change and the changes made. The community of practice lead was interviewed to discuss the professional development session's impact. Qualitative approaches were used to analyze the data.ResultsFrom the learner evaluations, nine areas of improvement were identified and discussed. All attendees made changes to their teaching practices, which the community of practice lead confirmed. Fewer changes were identified at the community of practice group level.ConclusionUsing learner evaluations to structure a professional development session within a community of practice can help identify areas of improvement and create strategies to address these challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据