4.6 Article

Incremental subgradient algorithms with dynamic step sizes for separable convex optimizations

期刊

MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN THE APPLIED SCIENCES
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 7108-7124

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mma.8958

关键词

diminishing step size; dynamic step size; incremental subgradient algorithm; separable convex optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the use of dynamic step sizes in the incremental subgradient algorithm for minimizing the sum of a large number of convex functions. Two modified dynamic step size rules are proposed and their convergence and complexity properties are analyzed. Experimental results show that these two algorithms converge faster and more stably than the previous ones, especially for solving large separable convex optimization problems.
We consider the incremental subgradient algorithm employing dynamic step sizes for minimizing the sum of a large number of component convex functions. The dynamic step size rule was firstly introduced by Goffin and Kiwiel [Math. Program., 1999, 85(1): 207-211] for the subgradient algorithm, soon later, for the incremental subgradient algorithm by Nedic and Bertsekas in [SIAM J. Optim., 2001, 12(1): 109-138]. It was observed experimentally that the incremental approach has been very successful in solving large separable optimizations and that the dynamic step sizes generally have better computational performance than others in the literature. In the present paper, we propose two modified dynamic step size rules for the incremental subgradient algorithm and analyse the convergence and complexity properties of them. At last, the assignment problem is considered and the incremental subgradient algorithms employing different kinds of dynamic step sizes are applied to solve the problem. The computational experiments show that the two modified ones converges dramatically faster and more stable than the corresponding one in [SIAM J. Optim., 2001, 12(1): 109-138]. Particularly, for solving large separable convex optimizations, we strongly recommend the second one (see Algorithm 3.3 in the paper) since it has interesting computational performance and is the simplest one.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据