4.7 Article

Effect of cryogenic thermal cycling on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Zr-based bulk metallic glasses

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.144513

关键词

Bulk metallic glasses; Cryogenic thermal cycling; Nanoindentation; Serrated flow; Shear transformation zone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the effects of cryogenic thermal cycling on the microstructure and plasticity of Zr60Cu20Al10Ni10 bulk metallic glass. The heterogeneity of the internal structure of the cryogenic thermal cycling-treated samples increases the energy state and introduces more flow defects, resulting in an improved room-temperature plasticity of Zr-based BMGs. This phenomenon indicates a more frequent generation of shear transition zones and shear band movement within them.
This article investigates the effects of cryogenic thermal cycling (CTC) on the microstructure and plasticity of Zr60Cu20Al10Ni10 (Zr60) bulk metallic glass (BMG). The microstructure and mechanical properties of Zr60 BMGs at different energy states are assessed through room-temperature compression and nanoindentation tests. The heterogeneity of the internal structure of the CTC-treated samples causes a different response to thermal expansion resulting in a non-uniform local stress field distribution, which increases the energy state of Zr60 BMGs. At the same time, in the CTC-treated Zr60 BMGs, more free volume (or flow defects) is introduced, and the plasticity is increased. It has been found that, after CTC, the room-temperature plasticity of Zr-based BMGs can be significantly improved by 2-3 times compared to that of the as-cast samples. This introduces flow defects and the inhomogeneous distribution of the strain field causes the serration behavior during the deformation of BMGs to occur more frequently and the second peak of the relaxation spectrum to be more pronounced. This phenomenon indicates a more frequent generation of shear transition zones and shear band movement within them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据