4.7 Article

Crack branching and deflection in AISI 4340 steel under cyclic torsional loading

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.144561

关键词

AISI 4340 steel; Torsional fatigue; Crack branch; Fracture mechanisms; Lath martensite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high-cycle torsional fatigue crack propagation behaviors of martensitic AISI 4340 steel were studied in this research. Quantitative analyses were conducted to investigate the branching mechanisms in the early stage and deflection characteristics in the later stage of crack propagation. It was observed that when the mode I stress intensity factor exceeded the threshold value K-I,K-th, the initial crack would split into four mode I cracks. Moreover, different pairs of branches had a competitive relationship. The backward pair of branches faced more boundary barriers and their driving force was reduced by the stress redistribution caused by the leading pair of branches. Additionally, the crack gradually transitioned from mode I to mode II due to grip restrictions. When K-II/K-I > 1.5, the crack growth became complete mode II.
The high-cycle torsional fatigue crack propagation behaviors of the martensitic AISI 4340 steel were investigated in this work. Quantitative analyses of fracture processes were conducted to establish the branching mechanisms in the early crack propagation stage and the deflection in the later crack propagation stage. It was found that when the mode I stress intensity factor was greater than the threshold value K-I,K-th, the initiated crack would branch off to four cracks in mode I. Furthermore, there is a competitive relationship among different pairs of branches. Firstly, the backward pair of branches encountered more boundary barriers. Secondly, their driving force was reduced by the stress redistribution caused by the leading pair of branches. In addition, due to the restriction of the grips, the crack would gradually turn into mode II from mode I. When K-II/K-I > 1.5, the cracks growth type became complete mode II.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据