4.7 Article

Ti-containing 316L stainless steels with excellent tensile properties fabricated by directed energy deposition additive manufacturing

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.144414

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Austenitic stainless steel; Microstructure; Mechanical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Additive manufacturing has been actively explored to produce complex shapes. In this study, 316L stainless steels with various amounts of Ti were fabricated using directed energy deposition. The addition of Ti changed the microstructure and significantly improved the tensile properties of austenitic stainless steels. Microstructural changes, such as cellular structure and grain refinement, were due to Ti-rich particles acting as new nucleation sites and suppressing the segregation of solute atoms. The tensile properties of the specimen with 2 wt% Ti showed significant improvement compared to the 316L stainless steel without Ti.
Additive manufacturing is used to produce complex shapes, and it has been actively investigated. In this study, 316L stainless steels with various amounts of Ti were fabricated using directed energy deposition. The addition of Ti changed the microstructure and significantly improved the tensile properties of austenitic stainless steels. The addition of Ti led to distinct microstructural evolutions, such as changes in the cellular structure, grain size and Ti-rich particle. Microstructural changes such as change in change to equiaxed cellular structure and grain refimenet were due to Ti-rich particles acting as new nucleation sites and suppressing the segregation of solute atoms. In particular, the yield strength, tensile strength, and elongation of the specimen with 2 wt% Ti were 637 MPa, 857 MPa, and 43%, respectively, which were considerably higher than those of 316L stainless steel without Ti. Therefore, the addition of Ti is a suitable strategy for improving the tensile properties of additively manu-factured 316L stainless steel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据