4.6 Article

ZnO interrelated graphene matrix-based sensors for quercetin

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 296, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.127238

关键词

Quercetin; Graphene; ZnO nanoparticles; Sensor; Sensing material

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An electrochemical study was conducted to investigate quercetin using graphene and zinc oxide nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrodes. The effects of phosphate buffer solution of different pH levels were tested, and pH 6.0 was found to be optimal. The electrochemical analysis of quercetin displayed oxidation and reduction peaks at 0.356 V and 0.324 V, respectively, with higher peak currents obtained at the modified electrode compared to the bare electrode.
An electrochemical study of quercetin (QUR) was carried out voltammetrically using graphene (Gr) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO) modified carbon paste electrodes (CPE). The effect of phosphate buffer solution (0.2 M PBS) of various pH was tested and we found that pH 6.0 was optimum. The electrochemical analysis of QUR involves a redox-coupled reaction with one oxidation peak at 0.356 V and a reduction peak at 0.324 V with a peak strength of 1.05 mu A and 0.413 mu A, respectively. The peak current obtained at the modified electrode was higher than the bare CPE, indicating the electrocatalytic behavior of the modifier. Surface characterization of GrZnO/CPE was evaluated using X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS). Sweep rate investigation provided knowledge about reaction mechanisms involving transferring an equal number of electrons and protons. The electrochemical process was governed by adsorption. The limit of detection (LOD) was computed to be 18.0 nM. The developed electrode material was utilized to determine QUR in real samples, which exhibited excellent recovery, demonstrating the utility of the proposed electrode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据