4.7 Article

Colony formation of Phaeocystis globosa: A case study of evolutionary strategy for competitive adaptation

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114453

关键词

Phaeocystis globosa; Colony; Algal bloom; Phycosphere; Adaptation; Nutrient adsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some algae have a multi-morphic life cycle, appearing as either free-living solitary cells or colonies in algal blooms. Despite the extra energy and resources required for colony formation, many algae tend to outbreak in the form of colonies. This study investigated different sizes of colonies and solitary cells in a natural bloom of Phaeocystis globosa and found that colonies have a competitive advantage due to lower oxidant stress, nutrient trap effect, and higher nutrient use efficiency. These features suggest that colony formation is an evolutionary strategy for competitive adaptation.
Some algae possess a multi-morphic life cycle, either in the form of free-living solitary cells or colonies which constantly occur in algal blooms. Though colony formation seems to consume extra energy and materials, many algae tend to outbreak in form of colonies. Here, we hypothesized that colony formation is a selected evolu-tionary strategy to improve population competitiveness and environmental adaptation. To test the hypothesis, different sizes of colonies and solitary cells in a natural bloom of Phaeocystis globosa were investigated. The large colony showed a relatively low oxidant stress level, a nutrient trap effect, and high nutrient use efficiency. The colonial nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations were about 5-10 times higher than solitary cell phycosphere and cellular nutrient allocation decreased with the enlargement of the colonial diameter following the economies of scale law. These features provide the colony with monopolistic competence and could function as an evolu-tionary strategy for competitive adaptation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据