4.4 Article

Recreational fishery discard practices influence use of tidal estuary by a large marine mesopredator

期刊

MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH
卷 74, 期 4, 页码 320-334

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/MF22146

关键词

batoidea; behavioural ecology; elasmobranchs; fishing discards; food provisioning; human-wildlife interactions; movement ecology; recreational fishing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that waste discarding by recreational anglers provides a predictable food subsidy for scavengers, and the movements of smooth stingrays were influenced by these discard practices. Understanding these behavioral responses is crucial for managing waste discarding in recreational fishing.
Context It is common for recreational anglers to discard waste produced from filleting catches back into the water, which results in a highly spatio-temporally predictable food subsidy for wildlife to scavenge. However, the behavioural responses of these scavengers has received little attention.Aims We aimed to assess the visitation of a common mesopredatory scavenger in relation to temporal patterns in waste discarding at a boat ramp in south-eastern Australia.Methods Using passive acoustic telemetry, the movements of 13 adult female smooth stingrays (Bathytoshia brevicaudata) were tracked, and patterns in their acoustic detections and duration of time spent in different sections within the study area were compared.Key results Use of the study area was strongly focused around the boat ramp, and peaked during periods of increased provisioning activity (i.e. afternoons and weekends). Environmental variables had limited influence on visitation, suggesting that the use of the area was not likely to be linked to natural behaviours.Conclusions The observed patterns indicated that the movements of smooth stingrays were linked to waste-discard practices by recreational anglers.Implications This study has implications for the management of discard practices for recreational fishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据