4.7 Article

The Contribution of Oligomerization Reaction Chemistry to the Thermomechanical Properties of Surface-Aligned Liquid Crystalline Elastomers

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.2c02371

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid crystalline elastomers (LCEs) exhibit large, directional deformation when aligned, and surface-enforced alignment enables complex 3-D shape transformations. Two-step reaction schemes, such as aza-Michael or thiol-Michael oligomerization followed by photopolymerization, have been commonly used to enforce orientation within LCEs. This study examines the impact of molecular weight on the stimulus response of LCEs, emphasizing its importance over the specific reaction used to form the oligomer.
Liquid crystalline elastomers (LCEs) are stimulus-responsive materials that, when macroscopically aligned, undergo large, directional deformation amplified by the disruption of order within a polymer network. Recently, surface-enforced alignment has been used to prepare LCEs with spatial variation in the director orientation that enables the realization of complex 3-D shape transformation. Surface-enforced alignment is advantageous because it allows for high-resolution, nonlinear patterning of the nematic director within an LCE. When using surface alignment to enforce orientation within LCEs, multiple two-step reaction schemes have been commonly used, primarily aza-Michael oligomerization or thiol-Michael oligomerization with each addition reaction followed by photopolymerization of the residual acrylate-terminated oligomers. Here, LCEs were prepared by each polymerization technique with varied amine or thiol concentrations. The mechanical properties, thermomechanical response, reaction kinetics, and alignment were characterized and assessed for LCEs. This examination emphasizes the importance of the molecular weight between crosslinks over the reaction used to form the oligomer in determining the magnitude of the stimulus response of LCEs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据