4.5 Article

Thiolated Cyclodextrin: Development of a Mucoadhesive Vaginal Delivery System for Acyclovir

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 105, 期 5, 页码 1714-1720

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.03.009

关键词

vaginal mucosa; thiomers; acyclovir; beta-cyclodextrin; mucoadhesion

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission, Pakistan (HEC)
  2. Austrian Agency for International Cooperation in Education and Research (OAD)
  3. FWF project [235150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was the development of a mucoadhesive vaginal delivery system for acyclovir (Acv). Sodium-per-iodate (NaIO4) was used to introduce aldehyde substructures into beta-cyclodextrin (beta-CD) by oxidative cleavage of vicinal diol bonds. Cysteamine was covalently attached to beta-CD-CHO via reductive amination. Ellman's reagent was utilized for quantification of free thiol groups attached and resazurin assay was used for cytotoxicity studies. Mucoadhesive properties were evaluated on porcine vaginal mucosa in comparison to intestinal mucosa. Quantification of thiol groups revealed 851.84 +/- 107, 1040.44 +/- 132, and 1563.72 +/- 171 mu mol/g of free thiol groups attached to the beta-CD-SH851, beta-CD-SH1040, and beta-CD-SH1563, respectively. beta-CD-SH derivatives at concentrations of 0.5% (m/v) did not show significant reduction of viability of Caco-2 cells within 24 h. Furthermore, water solubility of beta-CD-SH1563 was improved 7.6-fold in comparison to unmodified beta-CD. beta-CD-SH851, beta-CD-SH1040, and beta-CD-SH1563 showed 5.84-, 15.95-, and 17.14-fold improved mucoadhesive properties on porcine vaginal mucosa and 3-, 12.47-, and 32.13-fold on porcine intestinal mucosa, respectively. Inclusion complex of Acv with beta-CD-SH1563 resulted in significantly improved drug dissolution. According to the results, beta-CD-SH derivatives might be promising new tools for local vaginal delivery of Acv. (C) 2016 American Pharmacists Association r. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据