4.5 Article

Running streams of a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystal on a lithium niobate surface

期刊

LIQUID CRYSTALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02678292.2022.2161018

关键词

Liquid crystals; ferroelectric nematic phase; interaction with the electric field; dynamic phenomena

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sessile droplets of a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystalline material were observed to change shape and move rapidly along the surface electric field in X-cut iron-doped lithium niobate crystals under surface electric fields produced by pyroelectric and photogalvanic effects. The droplets merged into tendril-like formations and were transported to the edges of the crystal's top surface.
Sessile droplets of a ferroelectric nematic liquid crystalline material were exposed to surface electric fields produced by pyroelectric and photogalvanic (photovoltaic) effects in X-cut iron-doped lithium niobate crystals. The resulting dynamic processes were monitored by polarisation optical (video)microscopy (POM). During heating/cooling cycles, at first, the droplets change their shape from spherical to extended ellipsoidal. Then, they start to move rapidly along the surface electric field, i.e. along the crystal's polar axis (c-axis). During this motion, several droplets merge into running streams (tendrils) extending towards the edges of the top surface area. Finally, practically all liquid crystalline material is transported from the top surface to the side surfaces of the crystal. At stabilised temperatures, laser illumination of the assembly causes dynamic processes that are localised to the illuminated area. Also, in this case, the LC droplets merge into several tendril-like formations that are preferentially oriented along the c-axis of the crystal. The pattern of tendrils fluctuates with time, but it persists as long as the illumination is present. In this case, the LC material is transported between the central and the edge regions of the illuminated area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据