4.6 Article

Porous Hydrogels: Present Challenges and Future Opportunities

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 2092-2111

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c02253

关键词

physical appearance (nanoparticles; microparticles; monoliths

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this feature article, the physical properties and production methods of porous hydrogels are critically reviewed. The focus is on nondense hydrogels that have physical pores in addition to the space between adjacent cross-links in the polymer network. The article discusses theories on swelling kinetics, equilibrium swelling, structure-stiffness relationship, and solute diffusion in dense hydrogels, and proposes future directions for developing models for porous hydrogels. Different methods for making hydrogels with physically incorporated pores are also briefly reviewed, including bubble generation approaches and templating approaches.
In this feature article, we critically review the physical properties of porous hydrogels and their production methods. Our main focus is nondense hydrogels that have physical pores besides the space available between adjacent cross-links in the polymer network. After reviewing theories on the kinetics of swelling, equilibrium swelling, the structure-stiffness relationship, and solute diffusion in dense hydrogels, we propose future directions to develop models for porous hydrogels. The aim is to show how porous hydrogels can be designed and produced for studies leading to the modeling of physical properties. Additionally, different methods that are used for making hydrogels with physically incorporated pores are briefly reviewed while discussing the potentials, challenges, and future directions for each method. Among kinetic methods, we discuss bubble generation approaches including reactions, gas injection, phase separation, electrospinning, and freeze-drying. Templating approaches discussed are solid phase, self-assembled amphiphiles, emulsion, and foam methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据