4.6 Article

Solid-Phase Pyrolysis Synthesis of Highly Fluorescent Nitrogen/Sulfur Codoped Graphene Quantum Dots for Selective and Sensitive Diversity Detection of Cr(VI)

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c02966

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, N and S codoped highly fluorescent graphene quantum dots (N/S-GQDs) were prepared using a simple one-step solid-phase pyrolysis synthesis procedure. The as-synthesized quantum dot exhibited blue fluorescence emission dependent on excitation wavelength, with a relative quantum yield of about 22%, and showed good biocompatibility, high water dispersibility, and excellent stability under extreme conditions (ionic strength, pH, and temperature). The applicability of the as-synthesized quantum dot was demonstrated through solution-and paper-based fluorescence (FL) detection modes for Cr(VI) detection, with lower limit of detection (LOD) values of 0.01 and 0.4 μM, respectively. The paper-and solution-based FL sensors constructed in this study proved the feasibility of sensitive, cost-effective, and on-site detection of Cr(VI).
In this study, a simple one-step solid-phase pyrolysis synthesis procedure was employed to prepare N and S codoped highly fluorescent graphene quantum dots (N/S-GQDs). The as-synthesized quantum dot showed lambda excitation-dependent blue fluorescence (FL) emission with a relative quantum yield of about 22% and displayed good biocompatibility, high water dispersibility, and excellent stability under extreme conditions (i.e., ionic strength, pH, and temperature). The potential applicability of the as-synthesized quantum dot was tested by employing solution-and paper-based FL detection modes for Cr(VI) detection. The proposed solution-and paper-based FL sensors showed lower limit of detection (LOD) values of 0.01 and 0.4 mu M, respectively. The as-constructed paper-and solution-based FL sensors proved the feasibility of sensitive, cost-effective, and on-site detection of Cr(VI).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据