4.6 Article

Exploiting non-linear relationships between retention time and molecular structure of peptides originating from proteomes and comparing three multivariate approaches

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.01.055

关键词

Quantitative structure-retention; relationships (QSRR); LC-MS/MS; Genetic Algorithms; Non-linear relationships; Proteomics

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2013R1A1A1A05004852]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A1A05004852] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peptides' retention time prediction is gaining increasing popularity in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based proteomics.This is a promising approach for improving successful proteome mapping, useful both in identification and quantification workflows. In this work, a quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRR) model for its direct prediction from the molecular structure of 185 peptides originating from 8 well-characterized proteins and two Bacillus subtilis proteomes has been developed. Genetic Algorithm (GA) was used for selection of a subset of molecular descriptors coupled with three machine learning methods: Support Vector Regression (SVR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and kernel Partial Least Squares (kPLS) for regression. Final GA-SVR, GA-ANN, and GA-kPLS models were validated through an external validation set of 95 peptides originating from the human epithelial HeLa cells proteomes. Robustness and stability was ensured by defining their applicability domain. The descriptors of the developed models were interpreted confirming a causal relationship between parameters of molecular structure and retention time. GA-SVR model has shown to be superior over the others in terms of both predictive ability, and interpretation of the selected descriptors. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据