4.1 Article

Grain refinement, texture evolutions, and strengthening of a recycled aluminium alloy subjected to tube channel pressing

期刊

KOVOVE MATERIALY-METALLIC MATERIALS
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 13-21

出版社

REDAKCIA KOVOVE MATERIALY
DOI: 10.31577/km.2023.1.13

关键词

recycled aluminium; severe plastic deformation; grain refinement; strength; texture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the grain refinement, texture evolutions, and strengthening of a recycled Al-1.7Fe-0.9Si-0.5Cu alloy using the tube channel pressing severe plastic deformation process. Electron backscattered diffraction equipped scanning electron microscope was used to analyze the grain refinement and texture evolutions, while tension test was conducted to measure the strength. The results show that the first pass of the process leads to significant grain refinement and strength increase, but additional passes only result in minor grain refinement and slight strength decrease. Moreover, important texture components related to shear deformation have been observed due to the process imposition.
This works aims to study the grain refinement, the texture evolutions, and the strengthen-ing of the recycled Al-1.7Fe-0.9Si-0.5Cu alloy subjected to a recently developed severe plastic deformation process called tube channel pressing. For this purpose, an electron backscattered diffraction equipped scanning electron microscope is applied to investigate the grain refinement and the texture evolutions while the tension test is applied for the measurement of strength. Results show that the imposition of the first pass of the process causes an extensive refinement of grains besides a considerable increase in strength. Despite this, the imposition of additional passes causes a little grain refinement besides a minor strength decrease. Additionally, vital texture components related to the shear deformation have risen because of the imposition of the process. Also, the mechanisms responsible for these phenomena are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据