4.4 Article

Low generational cystamine core PAMAM derivatives modified with nuclear localization signal derived from lactoferrin as a gene carrier

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 379-389

出版社

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-022-1293-y

关键词

Nonviral Vector; Cationic Polymer; Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) Dendrimer; Transfection; Nuclear Localization Signal (NLS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, low generational cystamine core PAMAM dendrimers were modified with a lactoferrin-derived nuclear localization signal (NLS) peptide. The transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity of these modified dendrimers were evaluated. The results showed that NLS-modified cPAMAM G2 had the highest transfection efficiency and lower cytotoxicity compared to PEI, making it a promising candidate for gene delivery applications.
Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer has received much attention as an alternative to polyethylenimine (PEI) for gene delivery due to the relatively low cytotoxicity. In general, low generational PAMAM dendrimers have better biocompatibility than high generational dendrimers but suffer reduced transfection efficiency. Transfection efficiency can be improved by the modification of the polymer with nuclear localization signal (NLS) peptides. In this study, we modified low generational cystamine core PAMAM dendrimers (cPAMAM, generation 0, 1 and 2) with a lactoferrin-derived nuclear localization signal (NLS) peptide and evaluated transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity as a function of the number of conjugated NLS peptides using NIH 3T3, MCF-7 and human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). The transfection efficiency of NLS-modified cPAMAM G2 was the highest among the cPAMAM derivatives and similar or higher than PEI 25 kDa. The cytotoxicity of cPAMAM derivatives was generation-dependent and significantly lower than PEI 25 kDa. Our study indicates that cPAMAM G2 conjugated with NLS is a promising candidate for gene delivery applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据