4.7 Article

Cross-domain meta learning fault diagnosis based on multi-scale dilated convolution and adaptive relation module

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 261, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110175

关键词

Cross domain; Fault diagnosis; Meta learning; Deep learning; Small labeled samples

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A meta learning intelligent fault diagnosis method is proposed to address the problem of new faults not being identified due to lack of training data in the process of equipment operation. The method utilizes multi-scale dilated convolution and relation module for feature extraction and fault diagnosis. The training set is transformed into multiple tasks using meta learning strategy to train the proposed method, which is validated through bearing and gearbox experiments.
For the established fault classification system, new faults cannot be identified due to lack of training data in the process of equipment operation. Aiming at the problems of multi-classification, small samples, and cross-domain brought by the new faults, one meta learning intelligent fault diagnosis method is proposed based on multi-scale dilated convolution and relation module. Firstly, multi -scale convolution is utilized to improve the feature extraction effectiveness in the extraction module. Subsequently, the fusion module is designed by dilated convolution and stochastic pooling. Finally, the relation module is employed to evaluate the distance between samples for fault diagnosis. Crucially, the meta learning strategy is executed to transform the training set into multiple tasks to train the proposed method. The superiority and effectiveness of the proposed method is validated by bearing and gearbox experiments with a few labeled fault samples. For the bearing fault diagnosis test, the verification results show that the accuracy rate of this method is 95.11% in 8way 1-shot, which is increased by 6.15% on average.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据