4.7 Article

Intelligent optimization under blocking constraints: A novel iterated greedy algorithm for the hybrid flow shop group scheduling problem

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 258, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109962

关键词

Blocking; Iterated greedy algorithm; Makespan; Hybrid flow shop group scheduling problem; Neighborhood probabilistic selection strategies

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61803192, 61973203, 61966012, 62106073, 71533001]
  2. Guangyue Young Scholar Innovation Team of Liaocheng University [LCUGYTD2022-03]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China [2021JJ40116]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2021QE195, ZR2021QF036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a new flow shop combinatorial optimization problem, called the blocking hybrid flow shop group scheduling problem (BHFGSP). The proposed algorithm, a novel iterated greedy algorithm, is effective in solving the BHFGSP. Experimental results demonstrate the algorithm's performance.
This paper introduces a new flow shop combinatorial optimization problem, called the blocking hybrid flow shop group scheduling problem (BHFGSP). In the problem, no buffers exist between any adjacent machines, and a set of jobs with different sequence-dependent setup times needs to be scheduled and processed at organized manufacturing cells. We verify the correctness of the mathematical model of BHFGSP by using CPLEX. In this paper, we proposed a novel iterated greedy algorithm to solve the problem. The proposed algorithm has two key techniques. One is the decoding procedure that calculates the makespan of a job sequence, and the other is the neighborhood probabilistic selection strategies with families and blocking-based jobs. The performance of the proposed algorithm is investigated through a large number of numerical experiments. Comprehensive results show that the proposed algorithm is effective in solving BHFGSP. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据