4.6 Article

LC-tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of metformin and sitagliptin in human plasma after ion-pair solid phase extraction

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.08.011

关键词

Metformin; Sitagliptin; Ion-pair solid phase extraction; LC-MS/MS; Human plasma; Bioequivalence study

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India [IF 140410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was established for simultaneous determination of two oral hypoglycemic drugs metformin (MET) and sitagliptin (STG) in human plasma. The analytes were extracted from 50 mu L human plasma by ion-pair solid phase extraction using sodium lauryl sulphate on PhenomenexStrata-X (30 mg/l mL) cartridges. The chromatographic separation was accomplished on XSelect HSS CN (150 x 4.6mm, 5 mu m) column using mobile phase consisting of methanol-8.0 mM ammonium formate in water, pH 4.5 (80:20, v/v) under isocratic condition. Tandem MS detection was performed on a triple quadrupole spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source, operated in the positive mode. Multiple reaction monitoring (WHIM) was used to quantify the analytes following transitions, m/z 130.1 -> 60.1 and m/z 4083 -> 235.1 for MET and STG respectively. The method displayed acceptable linearity in the concentration range of 4.00-3200 ng/mL for MET and 1.00-800 ng/mL for STG. The intra-batch and inter-batch precisions were <= 5.1% and accuracy ranged from 96.5 to 103.3% for both the drugs. The mean recovery of MET and STG obtained from spiked plasma samples was 82.5% and 90.4% respectively with minimal matrix interference. Both the drugs were found to be stable under all mandatory storage conditions. The validated method was successfully applied to a clinical pharmacokinetic study for a fixed-dose tablet formulation containing 500 mg MET and 50 mg STG in 16 healthy volunteers. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据