4.3 Review

Review of geology and geomorphology of the Xalapa Monogenetic Volcanic Field, eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107689

关键词

Monogenetic basaltic volcanism; Monogenetic volcanic field; Morphometric analysis; Volcano density mapping; Volcanic hazards; Xalapa Monogenetic Volcanic Field

资金

  1. DGAPA-PAPIIT, UNAM [IA100921]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a detailed review of the Xalapa Monogenetic Volcanic Field (XMVF) in terms of its geology and geomorphology. It presents a renewed inventory of volcanoes, identifies new volcanoes, and provides geological mapping and morphometric analyses. The study also includes new radiocarbon dating and outlines the boundaries of the XMVF. The results suggest that the most likely hazards in the XMVF are lava flows, explosive eruptions, and phreatomagmatic activity, which could mainly affect the northern and southern flanks of Cofre de Perote volcano and the central XMVF sectors.
Monogenetic volcanic fields have associated volcanic hazards that are not always well constrained due to the lack of complete and well established geological and geomorphological studies, field boundaries, volcano inventories, and of detailed reconstruction of individual volcano eruptive histories. This work presents a detailed review and further insights into geology and geomorphology of the Xalapa Monogenetic Volcanic Field (XMVF), achieved by completing a comprehensive revision of all previous works on the XMVF, along with new data produced from extensive fieldwork, field and digital mapping, radiocarbon dating, and morphometric and density analyses. The main results are: (i) a renewed inventory of 72 XMVF monogenetic volcanoes - a total number larger than previously recorded (59); (ii) identification of six new and not previously identified monogenetic volcanoes: La Natividad, La Pedrera, El Puente, Rancho Sicomoro, and Puentecillas scoria cones, and the Tenampa maar; (iii) recognition of four possible new volcanoes integrating the Macuiltepet1 cluster, recorded in historical documents; (iv) corrections and new volcanoes identified in the volcano clusters of Pextlan, La Joya, Ocotepec, and Cruz Negra; (v) geological mapping of all lava flows associated with the 72 monogenetic volcanoes; (vi) comprehensive morphometric analyses of all 72 reported volcanoes; (vii) three new radiocarbon ages corresponding to 780 +/- 60 BP and 1340 +/- 60 BP lava flows of El Volcancillo scoria cone, and to 1300 +/- 60 BP and 1115 +/- 80 BP lavas of La Pedrera volcano; (viii) new evidence of the late Pleistocene to Holocene age of the Acatlan scoria cone; (ix) new outline of the boundaries of the XMVF based on fieldwork and remote sensing; and (x) volcanoes and lava flows density and distribution maps. From these results, we conclude that, in case of renewed monogenetic activity in the XMVF, the most likely deterministic hazard model would comprise effusion of lavas of variable length (3-40 km), of up to extremely long tube-fed pahoehoe lava flows; explosive activity ranging from typical to violent Strombolian style eruptions producing scoria cones, extensive fallouts, and associated pyroclastic density currents; and phreatomagmatic style activity producing maars, tuff rings and/or tuff cones, and sequences of wet pyroclastic density currents. Hazard distributions in these scenarios would be mainly controlled by topography, local tectonics, groundwater level and basement rocks lithology, and would mostly affect the north and south flanks of Cofre de Perote volcano, as well as central XMVF sectors where the metropolitan area of the city of Xalapa and towns of Naolinco and Acatldn locate. From this review, we conclude that without any further studies of geology and chemistry of every single volcano, the western boundaries of the XMVF will remain unclear, and the associated volcanic risk will remain underestimated. This work provides a fundamental basis from which further and more detailed work could be attained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据