4.3 Article

Deferasirox and vitamin D3 co-therapy mitigates iron-induced renal injury by enhanced modulation of cellular anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, and iron regulatory pathways in rat

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2022.127085

关键词

Oxidative stress; Ferroptosis; Hepcidin; Ferroportin; Transferrin receptor; Ferritin

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research in Umm Al-Qura University
  2. [17 -MED -1 - 01 - 0062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic iron overload-induced nephrotoxicity is associated with dysregulations in the renal vitamin D (VD) system, as well as renal oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. While deferasirox (DFX) reduces systemic iron levels, VD monotherapy is more effective in attenuating renal iron concentrations and tissue damage. However, the combination therapy approach exhibits the maximal remedial effects, possibly by enhanced modulation of renal iron-homeostatic molecules alongside reducing systemic iron levels.
Background: Chronic iron overload could induce nephropathy via oxidative stress and inflammation, and chelating therapy has limited efficacy in removing excess intracellular iron. Although vitamin D (VD) has shown potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, as well contribute to iron homeostasis, none of the previous studies measured its potential remedial effects against chronic iron toxicity. Aims: To measure the alleviating effects of deferasirox (DFX) and/or vitamin D (VD) single and combined therapies against nephrotoxicity induced by chronic iron overload.Methods: Forty male rats were divided into negative (NC) and positive (PC) controls, DFX, VD, and DFX/VD groups. The designated groups received iron for six weeks followed by DFX and/or VD for another six weeks. Then, the expression pattern of renal genes and proteins including hepcidin, ferroportin (FPN), megalin, transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1), ferritin heavy and light chains, VD receptor (VDR), VD synthesizing (Cyp27b1) and catabolizing (Cyp24a1) enzymes were measured alongside serum markers of renal function and iron biochemical parameters. Additionally, several markers of oxidative stress (MDA/H2O2/GSH/SOD1/CAT/GPx4) and inflam-mation (IL-1 beta/IL-6/TNF-alpha/IL-10) together with renal cell apoptosis and expression of caspase-3 (Casp-3) were measured.Results: The PC rats showed pathological iron and renal biochemical markers, hypovitaminosis D, increased renal tissue iron contents with increased Cyp24a1/Megalin/ferritin-chains/hepcidin, and decreased Cyp27b1/VDR/ TfR1/FPN expression than the NC group. The PC renal tissues also showed abnormal histology, increased in-flammatory (IL-1 beta/IL-6/TNF-alpha), oxidative stress (MDA/H2O2), and apoptosis markers with decreased IL-10/ GSH/SOD1/CAT/GPx4. Although DFX monotherapy reduced serum iron levels, it was comparable to the PC group in renal iron concentrations, VD and iron-homeostatic molecules, alongside markers of oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. On the other hand, VD monotherapy markedly modulated renal iron and VD -related molecules, reduced renal tissue iron concentrations, and preserved renal tissue relative to the PC and DFX groups. However, serum iron levels were equal in the VD and PC groups. In contrast, the best significant improvements in serum and renal iron levels, expression of renal iron-homeostatic molecules, oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis were seen in the co-therapy group.Conclusions: iron-induced nephrotoxicity was associated with dysregulations in renal VD-system together with renal oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. While DFX reduced systemic iron, VD monotherapy showed better attenuation of renal iron concentrations and tissue damage. Nonetheless, the co-therapy approach exhibited the maximal remedial effects, possibly by enhanced modulation of renal iron-homeostatic molecules alongside reducing systemic iron levels.Availability of data and materials: All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its Supplementary information files].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据