4.5 Article

The novel approach for the enhancement of rheological properties of water-based drilling fluids by using multi-walled carbon nanotube, nanosilica and glass beads

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 264-275

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.01.036

关键词

Lubricity; Coefficient of friction; Filtrate volume; Nanoparticles; Micronmaterials

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [RJ130000.7842.4F437, RJ130000.7842.4F551]
  3. Research University Grant [J130000.2542.08H72]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nano and micron materials are investigated in water-based drilling fluid (WBDF) to improve its rheological behaviour. Due to the environmental and certain operational concerns, the use of oil-based drilling fluid (OBDF) and synthetic based drilling fluid (SBDF) is restricted that caused the industry seeking for new ways to enhance rheological properties of WBDF. This study was based on investigating the applicability of multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT), nanosilica and glass beads (GBs) as primary additives for enhancing the filtrate volume, lubricity and other rheological properties of WBDF. This study focused on the effect of different concentrations such as 0.001 ppb, 0.002 ppb, 0.01 ppb, 0.02 ppb, 0.1 ppb, and 0.2 ppb of each MWCNT and nanosilica over the rheological performance of WBDF. Effect of GBs of different sizes such as (90-150 mu m) and (250-425 mu m) was investigated at different concentrations of 2 ppb, 4 ppb, 6 ppb, 8 ppb, 10 ppb, and 12 ppb over rheological performance of WBDF. Results revealed that coefficient of friction (CoF) for drilling fluid without nanoparticles and GBs was 0.238. 0.01 ppb of MWCNT and nanosilica provided 44% and 38% CoF reduction. 4 ppb of GBs (90-150 mu m) provided 28% CoF reduction. MWCNT showed 4.5 ml of filtrate volume and 2/32 inch of mud cake thickness. Thus, MWCNT can be a better choice as a drilling fluids additive for WBDF. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据