4.7 Article

Evaluation of thermal properties and process hazard of 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate through thermodynamic calculations and equilibrium methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 148, 期 11, 页码 4977-4984

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-022-11818-2

关键词

Organic peroxides; Runaway reaction; Kinetic parameter; Thermal decomposition; Thermal hazard

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the continuous development of battery technology, ionic liquids (IL) have gained attention as excellent electrolytes. This study focuses on the safety characteristics of a common ionic liquid at high temperatures. The results show that the ionic liquid exhibits short reaction time and hazard temperature at elevated temperatures.
With the continuous development of battery technology, there are new research investments in materials of various parts. In the field of electrolytes, ionic liquids (IL) are considered to be excellent electrolytes and have been widely studied in distinct energy fields. However, it is necessary to pay attention to the safety characteristics of ionic liquids at high temperature due to the application of energy. Still, there is little research on the reaction and kinetics of ionic liquids. To ensure the safety of ionic liquids, such as high temperature, the common ionic liquid 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate ([Hmim] NO3) was selected for analysis. The exothermic mode is obtained from the data of differential scanning calorimetry. The basic reaction parameters of [Hmim] NO3 were determined with thermodynamic equation simulation. For ionic liquids in the actual situation, consider adding a heat balance model to estimate its temperature change pattern and determine the hazard temperature and related safety parameters. Temperature changes were assessed by constructing 25.0 g and 50.0 g packages to simulate material reactions and heat transfer in the external environment. The results showed that [Hmim] NO3 had shorter TMRad and TCL (< 1 day) when the temperature was above 200 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据