4.3 Article

Stimulated emission cross sections and temperature-dependent spectral shifts of neutral nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamonds

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 70, 期 3, 页码 451-459

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jccs.202200501

关键词

fluorescent nanodiamonds; optical transition cross sections; photoluminescence; quantum defects; temperature sensing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work measured the stimulated emission cross sections of neutral nitrogen-vacancy (NV0) defects in single-crystal diamond by two-photon excitation. The peak stimulated emission cross section of NV0 centers was found to be 1.43 +/- 0.07 x 10(-17) cm(2) at 650 nm. The thermal shifts of the zem-phonon line of NV0 centers in nanoscale diamonds were also examined, and a temperature measurement sensitivity of 0.2 K.Hz(-1/2) was achieved.
The neutral nitrogen-vacancy (NV0) defects in diamond are photostable color centers, suitable for a wide range of applications in science and engineering. However, the photophysical properties of the centers have not yet been fully characterized. This work measured the stimulated emission cross sections of NV0 in a single-crystal diamond by two-photon excitation of its matrix at 344 nm. From the measured photoluminescence spectrum and the fluorescence lifetime of 20 +/- 1 ns, we determined a peak stimulated emission cross section of 1.43 +/- 0.07 x 10(-17) cm(2) at 650 nm for the NV0 centers. In addition, we have also examined the thermal shifts of the zem-phonon line of NV0 centers in nanoscale diamonds (similar to 100 nm in diameter) over the temperature range of 30-120 degrees C. A temperature measurement sensitivity of 0.2 K.Hz(-1/2) was achieved, which is about two-fold better than that of NV-, despite that the fluorescence intensity of NV0 is about six-fold lower than that of NV- in the same nanoparticles. The result is attributed to the smaller electron-phonon coupling strength of the neutral center, compared with its negatively charged counterpart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据