4.8 Article

Metal Node Control of Bronsted Acidity in Heterobimetallic Titanium-Organic Frameworks

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 145, 期 7, 页码 3855-3860

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c12718

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compared to indirectly modifying the framework, synthetic control of cluster composition allows direct access to catalytic activities without specific metal combinations. In this study, the aminolysis reaction of epoxides was tested using isostructural mesoporous frameworks with five combinations of homometallic and heterobimetallic metal-oxo trimers (Fe3, Ti3, TiFe2, TiCo2, and TiNi2). Only the TiFe2 nodes displayed activities comparable to benchmark catalysts based on grafting of strong acids, which arise from the combination of Lewis Ti4+ and Bronsted Fe3+-OH acid sites. The applicability of MUV-101(Fe) in the synthesis of beta-amino alcohols was demonstrated, including the gram-scale synthesis of propranolol, a natural beta-blocker listed as an essential medicine by the World Health Organization, with excellent yield and selectivity.
Compared to indirect framework modification, synthetic control of cluster composition can be used to gain direct access to catalytic activities exclusive of specific metal combinations. We demonstrate this concept by testing the aminolysis of epoxides with a family of isostructural mesoporous frameworks featuring five combinations of homometallic and heterobimetallic metal-oxo trimers (Fe3, Ti3, TiFe2, TiCo2, and TiNi2). Only TiFe2 nodes display activities comparable to benchmark catalysts based on grafting of strong acids, which here originate from the combination of Lewis Ti4+ and Bronsted Fe3+-OH acid sites. The applicability of MUV-101(Fe) to the synthesis of beta-amino alcohols is demonstrated with a scope that also includes the gram scale synthesis of propranolol, a natural beta-blocker listed as an essential medicine by the World Health Organization, with excellent yield and selectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据