4.7 Article

Structure and properties of cerium phosphate and silicophosphate glasses

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 106, 期 5, 页码 2808-2819

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.18936

关键词

cerium speciation; phosphate glasses; polaron conductivity; structure-property relations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the properties and structure of cerium pyrophosphate glasses and partially substituted cerium silicophosphates. The majority of cerium in these glasses is in the Ce(III) state. A combination of dynamic nuclear magnetic resonance and electrical impedance spectroscopy is utilized to determine the cerium speciation. Optical spectroscopy is limited in quantifying the ratio of Ce(III)/Ce(IV), but the effects of silica-for-cerium substitution on optical extinction and the UV band gap provide supporting evidence from vibrational spectroscopy. The stabilization of Ce(IV) by silica bonding to phosphate units restricts polaron transport, resulting in higher polaron activation energy and lower electronic conductivity. Meanwhile, Ce(III) is stabilized by coordinating to P = O.
We report on the fabrication, properties, and structure of cerium pyrophosphate glasses and partially substituted cerium silicophosphates. In those glasses, cerium occurs predominantly as Ce(III). A combination of dynamic nuclear magnetic resonance and electrical impedance spectroscopy is used to overcome the problem of assessing cerium speciation. While optical spectroscopy is unable to quantify the ratio of Ce(III)/Ce(IV) due to spectral overlap, proxy observations of the effect of silica-for-cerium substitution on optical extinction and the shape and width of the UV band gap corroborate vibrational spectroscopic data of the structural roles of cerium and silica. While silica bonding to phosphate units appears to stabilize Ce(IV), it also impedes the polaron transport, leading to higher polaron activation energy and lower electronic conductivity. On the other hand, Ce(III) is stabilized by coordinating to P = O.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据