4.5 Article

Defining a textbook outcome for the resection of colorectal liver metastases

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 127, 期 4, 页码 616-624

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.27170

关键词

colorectal; liver; outcome; quality; textbook

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to define textbook outcomes (TBO) specific to surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases and investigate their impact on survival. The analysis of all liver resections performed at their center from 2009 to 2020 revealed that major morbidity was the major limiting factor in not achieving a TBO. Achieving a TBO was associated with a significant improvement in survival.
IntroductionTextbook outcomes (TBO) are composite measures of care which may be superior in assessing quality compared to traditional methods. We aim to define TBO which are specific to surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases, and investigate their impact on survival. MethodsSingle center analysis of all liver resections performed at our center from 2009 to 2020. A Cox model was used to identify perioperative outcomes which impacted on overall survival. These were retained with important postoperative outcomes to form a TBO. The impact of a TBO on overall survival was investigated using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. ResultsTBO was achieved in 72.2% (197/273) of resections. Major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo >= 3) at 19.4% was the major limiting factor in not achieving a TBO. TBO was associated with improved 3-year (77% vs. 55%), 5-year (60.7% vs. 42.5%), and median (93 vs. 44 months) overall survival (log-rank test, p = 0.006). Multivariable analysis revealed age >65 years, American Society of Anaesthesiologists Grade III-IV, and resection of >2 segments as factors predictive of not achieving a TBO. ConclusionTBO is a useful composite measure in surgery for colorectal liver metastases. It can highlight areas which may be targeted for quality improvement and be useful as a tool to examine variation between centers. Achieving a TBO is associated with a significant improvement in survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据