4.4 Article

Lateral Performance Simulation of Conventional CLT Shear Wall and Structure by Equivalent Decomposed Wall Model

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
卷 149, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11245

关键词

Timber structures; Conventional cross laminated timber (CLT) shear walls; Lateral load resisting system; Connection; Hysteretic model; Time-history seismic analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to simulate the lateral responses of conventional cross laminated timber (CLT) shear walls by establishing equivalent decomposed wall models and provide lateral performance evaluation. The developed models accurately estimate the wall hysteresis behavior and can be a reference for CLT shear wall design.
The study aims to simulate the lateral responses of the conventional cross laminated timber (CLT) shear wall by establishing the equivalent decomposed wall models and providing lateral performance evaluation of walls with varied connections and walls in mass timber structures. First, the connection hysteresis model was built by calibrating the corresponding test results from references. Then, a detailed wall model, assembled with the calibrated connection models and shell elements, was calibrated with the wall experiments available in the literature. Based on the detailed wall model and the referred connection test results, an improved decomposed model with equivalent springs and shell elements was developed. The case studies indicate that both models captured the behavior of different connection configurations; however, the equivalent decomposed model provided a better prediction of the equivalent viscous damping ratio. The equivalent decomposed model was then applied in a full-scale three-story building time-history seismic analysis. The building simulation results indicate that the developed models can accurately estimate the wall hysteresis behavior, which can be a reference for CLT shear wall design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据