4.6 Article

Analytical results for the distribution of first-passage times of random walks on random regular graphs

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/ac9fc7

关键词

first passage; network dynamics; random graphs; networks; stochastic processes

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation
  2. [1682/18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents analytical results for the distribution of first-passage times of random walks on random regular graphs. The first-passage trajectories can be classified into those following the shortest path and those not following the shortest path.
We present analytical results for the distribution of first-passage (FP) times of random walks (RWs) on random regular graphs that consist of N nodes of degree c > 3. Starting from a random initial node at time t = 0, at each time step t > 1 an RW hops into a random neighbor of its previous node. In some of the time steps the RW may hop into a yet-unvisited node while in other time steps it may revisit a node that has already been visited before. We calculate the distribution P(T (FP) = t) of first-passage times from a random initial node i to a random target node j, where j not equal i. We distinguish between FP trajectories whose backbone follows the shortest path (SPATH) from the initial node i to the target node j and FP trajectories whose backbone does not follow the shortest path ( not sign SPATH). More precisely, the SPATH trajectories from the initial node i to the target node j are defined as trajectories in which the subnetwork that consists of the nodes and edges along the trajectory is a tree network. Moreover, the shortest path between i and j on this subnetwork is the same as in the whole network. The SPATH scenario is probable mainly when the length l ( ij ) of the shortest path between the initial node i and the target node j is small. The analytical results are found to be in very good agreement with the results obtained from computer simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据