4.6 Article

Stable effect on MIL-101(Cr) with Cu2+for the toluene adsorption

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 316, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2022.123633

关键词

Metal-organic frameworks; MIL-101(Cr); Cu2+doping; Adsorption; Volatile organic compounds

资金

  1. Key R & D Program of Shandong Province (Major Technological Innovation Project)
  2. Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. [2020CXGC011201]
  4. [ZR2019MEE112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are effective adsorbents for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) removal. The introduction of copper ions improves the adsorption capacity and thermal stability of the adsorbents.
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) cause great harm to the ecological environment and human health. Metal -organic frameworks (MOFs) are one of the high-performance adsorbents for the removal of VOCs. A typical MOFs material MIL-101(Cr) was prepared by hydrothermal synthesis, and the properties of the material were optimized by doping copper ions. All prepared adsorbents were characterized by XRD, FTIR, SEM, TG and N2 adsorption-desorption. The results showed that Cu@MIL-101(Cr) with different Cu2+ doping content was suc-cessfully prepared without changing the framework structure of MIL-101(Cr). However, the surface area and pore size of Cu@MIL-101(Cr) were reduced, the crystallinity and thermal stability were influenced by varying degrees. Among the samples, Cu-2@MIL-101(Cr) expressed the best adsorption ability on toluene due to the introduction of unsaturated metal sites by doped copper ions, which could improve the adsorption performance of MIL-101(Cr), and its saturation adsorption capacity could reach 469 mg/g. Although Cu2+ doping reduced the spe-cific surface area of the material, the increased active sites could greatly improve the adsorption performance of the material, meanwhile the desorption efficiency of Cu-2@MIL-101(Cr) could also reach 86% after 5 times cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据