4.2 Article

Open-ended question method investigation: A study with mashed potatoes

期刊

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12804

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The findings of this study provide insights into the type and effectiveness of information generated by open-ended questions in the context of food-related studies. Open-ended questions were tested for their questioning effect, information type, diversity of responses, and difficulty.
Twelve cultivars of potatoes were used for open-ended question (OEQ) method investigation. OEQs' were examined for answer box number effect, questioning type, and compared to check-all-that-apply (CATA) in the difficulty of information generation for sensory profile development. Up to four small list-style answer boxes were recommended for OEQ information collection irrespective of questioning type. A focused questioning technique on specific modalities was found to generate information that is more actionable over-generalized questioning. The frequency of abstract words was lowest in texture focused open-ended questioning, followed by aroma or flavor. Overall, OEQ's generated rich information but were difficult to accomplish (more cognitively challenging to respond than CATA, potential ambiguous interpretation of certain terms and dimensionality reduction through data analysis). Irrespective of method type, some cultivars of potato (CO99076-6R, Purple Majesty, AC99330-1PY, and Rio Colorado) were found to have similar textures whereas Purple Majesty and Masquerade were similar in flavor. Purple Majesty, Masquerade, CO99076-6R, and AC99330-1PY were liked for their texture. Masquerade cultivar was highly liked for aroma, flavor, and texture over others. Practical applicationsThe findings of this study are helpful to understand the type of information open-ended questions generate and how effectively they can be used to generate terminology in the context of food-related studies. Open-ended questions were tested for questioning effect, information type, diversity of responses, and difficulty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据