4.5 Article

Micronewton shear rheometer performing SAOS using 2 mg of sample

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY
卷 67, 期 1, 页码 207-218

出版社

SOC RHEOLOGY
DOI: 10.1122/8.0000494

关键词

Rheometer; Miniaturization; SAOS; Rheometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The researchers developed a miniaturized sliding-plates shear rheometer (mgRheo) that requires only a small amount of sample for rheological measurements. The mgRheo can measure forces ranging from micronewtons to millinewtons and perform standard rheological tests. The results obtained from the mgRheo showed good agreement with those from commercial rheometers, making it suitable for characterizing the linear viscoelasticity of soft matters.
Rheological measurements typically require at least 20-50 mg of sample. We set up a miniaturized sliding-plates shear rheometer (mgRheo) that requires only 2 mg sample or even less. We designed a flexure-based force-sensing device that could measure force ranging from the micronewton to millinewton scale, e.g., 40 mu N-400 mN for one particular spring constant. The setup was strain-controlled by a piezostage and could perform standard rheological tests such as small amplitude oscillatory shear, step strain, and stress relaxation. The accuracy and consistencies were evaluated on polydimethylsiloxane viscoelastic standard, entangled poly(hexyl methacrylate), and polystyrene. The obtained phase angles quantitatively agreed with those from commercial rheometers. The exact values of the modulus are prone to the over-filling of the sample. The storage G' and loss G'' moduli from the mgRheo were systematically higher than those from commercial rheometers (i.e., within 5% with careful trimming or 30% with excessive overfilling). Between 10(2) and 10(6) Pa, G' and G'' were in good agreement with commercial rheometers. Such a setup allowed for general rheometric characterizations, especially obtaining linear viscoelasticity on soft matters that are synthetically difficult to obtain in a large quantity. (C) 2022 The Society of Rheology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据